To block or not to block: The to and fro meetings between IT Minister, Twitter


The first pointers for web intermediaries have been launched in 2011. And then in 2018, on account of the huge modifications in the best way social media corporations and their customers have been shaping public discourse, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology deliberate a brand new set of pointers for these intermediaries. But then, for over two years, all was dormant. Until a public confrontation between Twitter and the IT Ministry compelled the latter’s hand to revive the 2018 draft, add extra guidelines and launch them. All in lower than a month’s time.

On January 26, as Delhi Police personnel and different paramilitary forces tried to include the violence after a splinter group, allegedly from the farmers’ rally, had marched into Delhi, one other group of officers on the Ministry of Electronics was maintaining a watch out for content material being shared on social media platforms. By midday that day, web providers had been suspended in components of Delhi and adjoining areas. Social media posts in assist of as nicely in opposition to the group of protesters that reached Red Fort and hoisted a non secular flag, nevertheless, continued unabated. And extra was but to come.

Around 3 pm that day, a tractor pushed by one of many protesters turned turtle after hitting a barricade positioned by Delhi Police on a street close to the Income Tax Office in central Delhi. The driver, a 24-year-old Navreet Singh, police later claimed was crushed underneath the tractor he was driving. On the opposite hand, his members of the family and different protesters later claimed that he was shot and died due to police firing.

Social media had, in the meantime, arrived at its conclusions, with many on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube claiming that Delhi Police had certainly resorted to firing on protesters. Supporting this declare have been activists, political occasion members and even senior journalists from media homes.

Though a few of these posts have been later deleted, the IT Ministry had taken be aware and was getting ready to ship Twitter a brief take-down discover of those tweets as “they had spread misinformation which could lead to further violence”. “It is unbecoming of such senior journalists and politicians to send out information to their followers without any verification whatsoever. 300 Delhi Police personnel were injured that day…they were attacked by swords. Flip the coin and imagine if these many protesters had been injured due to any reason whatsoever, what would have been the situation?” a senior IT Ministry official instructed The Sunday Express later.

On January 30, a number of tweets, with the hashtag “ModiPlanningFarmerGenocide”, have been posted by accounts supporting the farmers’ agitation, activists, and some politicians. The Ministry, officers mentioned, virtually instantly issued an emergency blocking order asking Twitter to instantly take down the hashtag and block entry to such accounts.

The IT Ministry had requested Twitter to block entry to, or take down 250 such tweets and accounts, which have been both utilizing the hashtag or content material related to it. Twitter complied, in the interim, taking down the accounts, together with these of reports portal Caravan India and Aam Aadmi Party MLA Jarnail Singh. A Twitter account by the identify of Kisan Ekta Morcha was additionally taken down.

But then lower than 24 hours later, a few of these accounts have been restored, so was some content material. The platform, by its admission, restored a few of these accounts, because it believed that the emergency orders handed by the IT Ministry have been not as per the free speech legal guidelines of the nation.

This flexing did not sit nicely with senior officers at IT Ministry in addition to different authorities businesses. Twenty 4 hours later, Twitter was served with one other discover, this time for non-compliance of the IT Ministry’s orders underneath its emergency blocking powers. Three days later, on February 4, the IT Ministry despatched Twitter one other record of 1,178 accounts, asking the platform to both droop their entry in India or block them as these had been “flagged by security agencies as accounts of Khalistan sympathisers or backed by Pakistan”. Twitter dithered. And that was greater than sufficient to take a look at the persistence of the IT Ministry. Talks of strict authorized and penal motion in opposition to prime Twitter officers in India began doing the rounds, which was sufficient to make the platform blink.

In a letter to IT Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad on February 8, Twitter mentioned that the “safety” of its workers in India was “top priority” and due to this fact it had “from a position of respect” reached out to the Minister for dialogue.

Prasad, nevertheless, had had sufficient, and virtually instantly refused to meet “anyone from Twitter”, officers had then mentioned. He had as a substitute requested IT Secretary Ajay Prakash Sawhney to preside over the assembly, which was set for February 10.

The scenario had practically subtle when in a curious flip of occasions, Twitter printed a weblog publish on the morning of the assembly. In a 650-odd phrase publish, Twitter began by saying that it believed “transparency” was the inspiration to “promoting healthy public conversation”.

“It is critical that people understand our approach to content moderation and how we engage with governments around the world,” Twitter had mentioned in its weblog, detailing later what motion it had taken or not taken on the notices despatched by the IT Ministry.

In gaming parlance, the weblog was the third strike for Twitter. IT Ministry officers responded, first on Koo, a homegrown micro-blogging web site that the publishing of the weblog earlier than a scheduled assembly — or which Twitter had reached out to them—was “unusual”. For shut to 12 hours that day, it was unclear if the assembly would go on as deliberate, with a number of officers saying it will likely be deferred to a later date. By 7:30 pm, nevertheless, the assembly was again on observe and Twitter was in for “an earful”. Of all of the issues that Ministry officers discovered objectionable in Twitter’s response throughout the whole episode, the corporate’s lack of willingness to act on a number of posts that used the phrase “genocide” relating to the dealing with of the farm protest was probably the most unacceptable.

“The Secretary told Twitter officials in very clear terms that they should not teach India how to interpret its laws on free speech. We have handled protests much better than them and they should certainly not tell us how to do that after the Capitol Hill violence and their handling of black lives matter protests,” one other senior official mentioned. The assembly had the specified impact for the federal government as Twitter mentioned it had eliminated 95 per cent of the content material and blocked all of the handles, other than additionally agreeing to “restructuring” of India management for higher communication with the federal government.

A day later, to reinforce the stand that his Ministry had taken, Prasad instructed the Rajya Sabha that whereas all social media corporations have been free to do enterprise in India, they need to respect the legal guidelines of the land. Twitter India has been on a stoic silence mode since then and did not even react to the brand new guidelines for social media intermediaries. Whether it was in the event that they certainly had no feedback to share, or as a result of they needed to keep a low profile after the standoff, is just for the time and Twitter to reply.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here