‘Nobody believed me’: How rape cases get dropped


Written by Jan Ransom

Cammy Duong awakened in a Manhattan resort room in July 2017 and, dazed, known as a pal she was supposed to fulfill later that morning. “I think I was raped,” she stated, crying.

The police investigation lasted months. But when the case reached the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, prosecutors rapidly declined to convey costs, data present. It could be seven extra months earlier than Duong bought an evidence.

“I remember leaving and crying and feeling helpless,” stated Duong, now 32. “I felt like nobody believed me.”

The #MeToo motion led to heightened consciousness of the prevalence of sexual assault, a rise in stories to police and a brand new hope that folks accused could be extra continuously held accountable. But in New York City, statistics and the accounts of ladies who say they have been attacked counsel that little has modified about the best way the prison justice system grapples with rape accusations.

Most New York City prosecutors’ workplaces rejected a larger share of intercourse crime cases in 2019, the final yr for which dependable information is out there, than they did roughly a decade earlier, earlier than the case towards Harvey Weinstein touched off a nationwide reckoning.

Cyrus Vance, Jr, Manhattan district legal professional, has been criticized for his workplace’s dealing with of intercourse crimes, together with the inquiry into Harvey Weinstein. (New York Times)

In the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, prosecutors dropped 49% of sexual assault cases in 2019 — among the many highest fee within the metropolis, and a rise from 37% in 2017, state information exhibits. Only the Bronx rejected a larger share of cases. The information excludes most intercourse crimes towards youngsters and sure nonviolent offenses like stalking.

The low prosecution fee partly displays the inherent challenges of prosecuting sexual assault, significantly cases like Duong’s, through which the attacker is just not a stranger and alcohol is concerned. For cases that aren’t dropped, conviction charges for sexual assault cases are usually a lot decrease than for different violent crimes: 44% in Manhattan in 2019, in contrast with 79% for first-degree homicide.

“There aren’t really any third-party witnesses to these things,” stated Carl Bornstein, a former state and federal prosecutor who teaches at John Jay College of Criminal Justice. “This is tough sledding. The prosecutor has to assess: Is this going to hold up under the scrutiny of 12 people?”

But some who research the matter consider the excessive drop fee additionally displays prosecutors’ unwillingness to sort out these challenges. The problem grew to become a spotlight of the race to succeed the district legal professional, Cyrus Vance Jr., who didn’t run for reelection.

Vance, who heads one of many largest and most distinguished district legal professional workplaces within the nation, has confronted harsh criticism over his workplace’s dealing with of intercourse crimes, together with the 2015 investigation into Weinstein, the previous Hollywood producer who was convicted final yr of rape and sexual assault, and the no-jail plea deal in 2016 for a Columbia University gynecologist accused of molesting dozens of sufferers.

Some who’ve sought justice in Manhattan, like Duong, stated their stories have been handled dismissively by Manhattan prosecutors. Others stated they have been dismissed or berated.

“Prosecutor negligence is often part of the problem,” stated Jane Manning, a former intercourse crimes prosecutor and the director of the Women’s Equal Justice Project. “There’s a long, disgraceful legacy in our criminal justice system of not taking rape seriously.”

Rape cases New York A rape survivor in Inwood Park within the Bronx. (New York Times)

Alvin Bragg, a former federal prosecutor who received the Democratic main for district legal professional, making him the heavy favourite to succeed Vance, has promised to revamp the workplace’s beleaguered intercourse crimes bureau.

Bragg, in an interview, stated he deliberate to “reboot” the intercourse crimes bureau “from the ground up” by assessing its management and workers with enter from survivors. He stated that he additionally supposed to guage why sure cases are rejected and that the probability of a conviction shouldn’t be a figuring out issue.

Although the variety of rape stories made to police jumped round 20% after Weinstein’s conduct was uncovered, it’s troublesome to find out how robust or weak these extra cases have been. The variety of cases closed by Manhattan prosecutors — by successful convictions, dropping the cases or securing pleas to lesser costs — has not deviated a lot every year from the common over the previous decade.

Facing protests over his workplace’s dealing with of sexual assault cases, Vance commissioned a research of his intercourse crimes bureau by AEquitas, a nonprofit that gives prosecutors with sources on violence towards ladies.

The research, accomplished in November and offered to The New York Times by Vance’s workplace, discovered that prosecutors “do not always fully explore alternative ways of achieving a just result,” like bringing totally different costs or looking for extra proof.

The research, based mostly on interviews with prosecutors, police investigators, victims and others, described a notion that selections about which cases to pursue have been based mostly on the probability of a conviction and that more difficult cases — akin to people who concerned acquaintances or intoxication — have been usually rejected. The report additionally discovered that a few of these interviewed believed that prosecutors “default to disbelieving victims” till they show their credibility.

Based on that view, the report stated, the tradition throughout the workplace “creates an expectation” that prosecutors win cases and that they have a tendency “not to pursue cases that they believe to be especially challenging.”

Responding to ongoing public criticism, Vance has applied trainings for the bureau centered on the consequences of trauma on victims, in addition to on sexual assault within the LGBTQ group, and on alcohol-facilitated rape, stated Audrey Moore, a primary assistant district legal professional. The intercourse crimes unit additionally has new management.

Vance, in an interview, stated his workplace should reckon with its dealing with of people that report sexual assault.

“At the end of the day, if the perception is that lawyers in our office are short or in anyway disrespectful to victims, that’s unacceptable,” Vance stated. “We as an office need to deal with it and educate our assistants on how to be better at their interactions with survivors and victims.”

The experiences of ladies like Duong increase questions for prosecutors like Bragg and lawmakers, who’ve been reconsidering New York’s rape legal guidelines. How ought to prosecutors strategy cases the place victims’ accounts are credible however could also be troublesome to show in court docket? Should the state’s legal guidelines make convictions in such cases simpler to win? And how ought to the prison justice system stability the rights of the accused with a contemporary understanding of sexual violence?

The Times reviewed three cases from 2017 through which prosecutors ultimately determined to not pursue costs towards the boys accused of rape, interviewing greater than two dozen witnesses, associates, relations, attorneys and investigators in addition to reviewing police paperwork, medical data, emails and audio recordings.

rape survivor A rape survivor in Prospect Park in Brooklyn on Dec. 10, 2020. (New York Times)

The Times realized in regards to the cases from an advocate for victims of rape and a Manhattan protection lawyer troubled by a case’s final result. Duong contacted the Times immediately about her case.

The ladies who reported being raped stated prosecutors appeared overworked, have been unresponsive and handled preliminary conversations like cross-examinations. Their cases additionally demonstrated the inherent problems in prosecuting cases past an affordable doubt — even when the accuser herself has little doubt in any respect.

Too Much of a Hurdle

It was Sept. 30, 2017, and the girl, then a graduate pupil at Fordham University, had been consuming closely at her sorority’s occasion at a venue in Brooklyn. She stated she recalled attempting to assist a drunk pal within the lavatory when, she stated, a male pal got here in and raped her. (The Times doesn’t publish the names of rape victims until they select to be recognized.)

Later that evening, she stated, she woke as much as the person raping her once more whereas choking her in his room at City College in Manhattan, the place he was a pupil. She stated that she didn’t keep in mind how she bought there from the occasion and that the person was recording her along with his cellphone.

When she realized what was taking place, she stated, she grabbed the cellphone and bumped into the lavatory. She then confirmed the video to a different pupil, Carlos Colon, who had been within the subsequent room. After seeing the video, Colon fought with the person and was later charged with assault. Colon stated in an interview that the girl had seemed to be unresponsive within the video.

Soon after the encounter with the girl, the person spoke by cellphone with considered one of his fraternity brothers, who recorded the decision and offered it to the Times. During that decision, the coed admitted to filming the girl and stated that was the place he had “messed up.” He later advised his fraternity brothers that he had had intercourse with the girl whereas she was asleep, two of them stated in interviews.

The girl reported the assault, however through the three-month investigation that adopted, she stated prosecutors appeared skeptical. They requested her how a lot she had needed to drink, why she didn’t battle again and whether or not she had needed to cheat on her boyfriend, she stated.

Prosecutors advised the girl that the intoxication she described didn’t represent being “physically helpless” underneath the state’s legislation and that they might not show that she didn’t consent, in response to a recording of the dialog. They by no means discovered the video.

In New York and most different states, an individual is taken into account incapacitated — and thus unable to consent to intercourse — if she or he is intoxicated, however provided that the intoxication is involuntary, akin to if it was brought on by a drug surreptitiously dropped right into a drink. If the consuming was voluntary, prosecutors have a harder path to conviction: They should show that drive was used, that the individual was unconscious or that the sufferer stated or signaled that they didn’t need intercourse.

At least 14 states — together with California, Arizona, South Carolina and Maryland — have expanded the definition of incapacitation to incorporate voluntary intoxication. Vance and girls’s advocacy teams have known as on New York to do the identical, however a proposal to take action has stalled in Albany over considerations that such a change might criminalize a typical scenario: one through which each companions have been consuming, communication is impaired, and reminiscences after the very fact are hazy.

In January 2018, a choose granted prosecutors’ request to dismiss the case towards the City College pupil. Through his public defender, the coed declined to touch upon the case.

But the Fordham pupil was not the one girl to accuse him of rape.

In defending Colon towards the assault cost, his lawyer, Nathaniel Broughty, filed a court docket movement in January 2018 saying that the coed confronted one other rape accusation and that City College campus police had discovered movies on his cellphone that confirmed him having intercourse with unconscious ladies. But the movies have been gone by the point prosecutors searched the cellphone. Citing privateness considerations, school officers didn’t reply to questions from the Times in regards to the movies and their investigation.

The Times additionally interviewed one other girl, Maria Guzman, who stated she and a pal had been consuming on the man’s residence in Queens in 2016. Guzman, now 25, stated she awoke in ache to him raping her. While out and in of consciousness, she stated, she noticed him rape her pal, who was fully unconscious.

Guzman, after studying by way of associates in regards to the alleged rape in 2017 at City College, stated she reported her assault to the police in Manhattan, who advised her to talk with detectives in Queens. Feeling dismissed, she dropped the matter.

Although the City College pupil was by no means charged in relation to the opposite accusations, prosecutors might have used their testimony to attempt to bolster the case they’d towards him.

Karen Friedman Agnifilo, the previous Manhattan chief assistant district legal professional, acknowledged that the workplace had erred on this case by not following investigative leads.

“It was a missed opportunity, and we can do better, and we will do better,” Friedman Agnifilo stated, including that the workplace revamped its case administration system to require {that a} second set of senior prosecutors assessment cases to make sure investigations have been thorough.

A 2018 investigation by City College discovered that the coed had engaged in “nonconsensual sexual intercourse” with the girl whose case had been dropped by the district legal professional. The pupil was suspended for 4 years, college data present.

But the one individual punished was Colon, now 27, whose costs have been dismissed solely after the completion of group service.

‘A Broken System’

Rachel Lesser stated she was raped in a Manhattan resort room by an ex-boyfriend who needed to reunite. They dated for a yr earlier than breaking apart in 2016, she stated, however they agreed to spend a platonic weekend collectively the subsequent yr.

While she was napping the primary night within the mattress they shared, Lesser woke to him kissing her, she stated, and he or she advised him she was not concerned about him sexually.

On the second evening, after she drank a number of glasses of prosecco and took NyQuil for a chilly, Lesser stated she woke to him shaking her.

Her underwear was on the ground, and her anus was bleeding, she stated. She had a obscure recollection of sexual exercise however couldn’t recall particulars. But the person, in a weird cellphone name to Lesser’s mom, advised her he had had intercourse with the girl, her mom stated.

Doubtful she would get justice, Lesser, now 30, stated she waited two days to go to a hospital and contacted the police a month later.

Detectives had her place a “controlled call” to the person, through which she confronted him over the cellphone whereas detectives secretly recorded him, she and her grandmother stated. He acknowledged having intercourse with Lesser, though he stated he thought she had been awake, prosecutors stated. Four months later, in October 2017, the person was arrested, prosecutors stated.

But because the case proceeded, in Lesser’s recollection, the prosecutor, Justin McNabney, peppered her with questions on her relationship with the person and questioned how she might sleep by way of a rape, she stated. The workplace disputed they’d questioned the latter and stated that questions on her historical past with the person have been related to the investigation.

Prosecutors stated the person said throughout an interview with them that he believed she had consented as a result of she was transferring and that he had stopped when he realized she could be asleep.

McNabney suggested her to get on together with her life, Lesser recalled.

Once when she known as for an replace on the investigation, she stated, the prosecutor yelled that he had plenty of cases on his plate, together with an tried homicide, earlier than abruptly ending the decision. The workplace disputed her characterization and stated the prosecutor had advised Lesser that he would reply to emailed questions.

Prosecutors dropped the case a month later due to inadequate proof, the workplace stated. With no reminiscence of what had occurred, prosecutors stated, they might not show Lesser didn’t consent.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here