New HC bench to hear Mamata’s election petition challenging Suvendu’s Nandigram win on Wednesday

0
28

Image Source : FILE/PTI

New HC bench to hear Mamata’s election petition challenging Suvendu’s Nandigram win on Wednesday

A brand new bench will take up on Wednesday West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee’s election petition earlier than the Calcutta High Court challenging BJP chief Suvendu Adhikari’s victory from the Nandigram constituency within the meeting elections. The case was reassigned to the bench of Justice Shampa Sarkar by Acting Chief Justice Rajesh Bindal after Justice Kausik Chanda recused from listening to the Trinamool Congress supremo’s election petition.

The matter has been listed for listening to at 2.30 pm on Wednesday.

Adhikari defeated Banerjee from the Nandigram constituency by 1,956 votes within the meeting election held earlier within the 12 months.

Justice Kausik Chanda had on July 7 recused from listening to the Trinamool Congress supremo’s petition challenging the election of Adhikari from Nandigram, and imposed a value of Rs 5 lakh on her for the way during which the recusal was sought.

Releasing the election petition of Banerjee on an utility by her for recusal expressing apprehension of bias in opposition to her by his bench, Justice Chanda had mentioned that he was doing so so as to thwart on the outset makes an attempt by trouble-mongers to hold the controversy alive.

Banerjee’s legal professionals had instructed that Justice Chanda ought to recuse himself from the case since he was related to the authorized cell of the BJP earlier than his elevation as a Judge and had appeared in quite a lot of instances on behalf of the mentioned occasion earlier than the excessive courtroom as a lawyer.

Her lawyer had instructed throughout his submissions earlier than the courtroom that there’s a battle of curiosity since Justice Chanda had an in depth relationship with the BJP and the petitioner has challenged the election of a BJP candidate.

In its order, the courtroom had mentioned that it’s preposterous to counsel {that a} decide having a previous affiliation with a political occasion as a lawyer mustn’t obtain a case involving the mentioned political occasion or any of its members.

Justice Chanda had famous that like another citizen of the nation, a decide additionally workouts his voting rights in favour of a political occasion, however he lays apart his particular person predilection whereas deciding a case.

READ MORE: Shatrughan probably to be part of Mamata’s TMC, talks in ‘superior stage’

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here